Home

Trading Signals by Subscription

Trading Systems for Purchase

Free Stuff

Login
About Keith Fitschen
Contact Information
Preferred Brokers
Subscribe/Order Information and Pricing
Subscribe/Order

ABERRATION vs. THE ABERRATION STRATEGY

I developed Aberration in 1986 and first marketed it in 1993. None of the four portfolios we recommended in the trading manual had a losing year for nine straight years. But starting about the year 2000, the basic commodity markets were becoming increasingly volatile.

I sought to find an answer to trading the markets in the new, more volatile environment and focused on risk throughout a signaled trade. The answer I found was relatively simple: if risk is outside normal bounds when the trade is signaled, the trade should be bypassed. Or, if risk gets outside of normal bounds during a trade, the trade should be exited. The original Aberration system was augmented with rules to implement this logic, and the result is THE ABERRATION STRATEGY.

DISCLAIMER

The performance reported in this letter is hypothetical. It is based on the use of computerized system logic on CSI data. Trading costs (slippage and commission) have been accounted for by deducting $50 from each trade. Please note the following Commodity Futures Trading Commission disclaimer on hypothetical trades:

NOTICE: "HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

PROFITABILITY BY COMMODITY

The following tables show the performance of THE ABERRATION STRATEGY on a basket of 70 world-wide commodities from 1980. A slippage/commission figure of $50 has been deducted from each trade.

Grains (1980 - February 2007)
Commodity
Winning Trades
Losing Trades
Total Profit
Profit-per- Trade
Corn
29
27
$10,987
$196
Oats
18
36
-$7,000
-$130
Soybeans
25
29
$22,612
$418
Bean Meal
22
35
$2,679
$47
Bean Oil
26
32
$7,588
$130
Wheat
20
35
-$813
-$15
KC Wheat
21
30
$13,475
$264
Rough Rice
20
16
$11,689
$324
Crude Palm Oil
11
10
$7,918
$377
Totals
192
250
$69,135
$156

 

Meats (1980 - February 2007)
Commodity
Winning Trades
Losing Trades
Total Profit
Profit-per- Trade
Live Cattle
29
27
$19,310
$344
Lean Hogs
22
34
$19,089
$340
Pork Bellies
22
34
$15,580
$278
Feeder Cattle
22
35
$14,975
$262
Totals
95
130
$68,954
$306

 

Softs (1980 - February 2007)
Commodity
Winning Trades
Losing Trades
Total Profit
Profit-per- Trade
Coffee
18
28
$68.668
$1,492
Cotton
20
29
$28,785
$587
Lumber
27
27
$24,513
$453
Cocoa
23
29
$13,190
$253
Sugar
23
26
$27,218
$555
Orange Juice
23
37
$7,770
$129
London Cocoa
22
29
$18,934
$371
London Coffee
20
22
$12,945
$308
London Sugar
20
18
$17,760
$467
Totals
196
245
$219,783
$498

 

Metals (1980 - February 2007)
Commodity
Winning Trades
Losing Trades
Total Profit
Profit-per- Trade
Copper
23
33
$24,724
$441
Palladium
21
25
$27,725
$602
Silver
18
29
$27,985
$595
Gold
22
23
$27,220
$604
Platinum
24
27
$19,204
$376
London Copper
21
31
$17,000
$326
London Alloy
15
13
$11,460
$409
London Aluminum
15
18
$33,275
$1,008
London Nickel
25
24
$105,418
$2,151
London Tin
16
15
$19,525
$629
London Zinc
15
17
35,775
$1,117
Totals
215
255
$349,311
$743

 

Energies (1980 - February 2007)
Commodity
Winning Trades
Losing Trades
Total Profit
Profit-per- Trade
Crude Oil
26
16
$45,370
$1,080
Natural Gas
16
18
$32,110
$944
Heating Oil
22
29
$17,819
$349
Reformulated Gas
20
23
$38,611
$897
Propane
19
17
$55,450
$1,540
London Crude
20
13
$41,910
$1,270
London Gas Oil
21
35
$8,555
$152
Totals
144
151
$239,825
$813

 

Currencies (1980 - February 2007
Commodity
Winning Trades
Losing Trades
Total Profit
Profit-per- Trade
Japanese Yen
29
25
$73,474
$1,360
Swiss Franc
25
26
$74,524
$1,461
Canadian $
25
24
$18,080
$368
British Pound
24
28
$39,343
$756
Dollar Index
25
17
$59,019
$1,405
Mexican Peso
11
12
-$2,300
-$100
Australian ($)
20
29
$11,309
$230
Euro Currency
24
32
$88,100
$1,573
Totals
183
193
$361,553
$961

 

US Financials (1980 - February 2007)
Commodity
Winning Trades
Losing Trades
Total Profit
Profit-per- Trade
30-Year Bond
28
25
$44,037
$830
10-Year Note
27
17
$56,815
$1,290
5-Year Note
20
17
$18,900
$510
2-Year Note
18
12
$15,734
$524
Eurodollar
23
21
$18,337
$416
Totals
116
92
$153,823
$740

 

Foreign Financials (1980 - February 2007)
Commodity
Winning Trades
Losing Trades
Total Profit
Profit-per- Trade
Australian Bond
21
23
$3,358
$76
Canadian Bond
16
19
$8,388
$239
Euro Bund
19
12
$36,374
$1,173
Long Gilt
19
32
-$3,226
-$64
Spanish Bond
15
9
$26,033
$1,084
Simex Jap. Bond
10
12
$12,945
$588
Euro Bobl
17
7
$27,003
$1,125
Totals
117
114
$110,875
$480

 

Stock Indices (1980 - February 2007)
Commodity
Winning Trades
Losing Trades
Total Profit
Profit-per- Trade
S&P 500
17
30
-$3,198
-$69
Russell 2000
10
16
-$5,580
-$215
Midcap 400
11
20
-$9,336
-$302
Nasdaq 100
10
10
$11,960
$598
Dow Jones
4
18
-$12,200
-$555
Hang Seng
17
21
$55,801
$1,468
DAX
13
17
$86,637
$2,887
Swiss Market Index
11
14
$26,835
$1,073
Kospi
8
12
$14,704
$735
Nikkei
15
16
$76,225
$2,458
Totals
116
174
$241,848
$834

 

Group Summary (1980 - February 2007)
Commodity
Winning Trades
Losing Trades
Total Profit
Profit-per- Trade
Grains
192
250
$69,138
$156
Meats
95
130
$68,955
$306
Softs
196
245
$219,785
$498
Metals
215
255
$349,313
$743
Energies
144
151
$239,826
$813
Currencies
183
193
$361,553
$961
US Financials
116
92
$153,825
$740
Foreign Financials
117
114
$110,875
$480
Stock Indices
116
174
$214,851
$833
Totals
1,374
1,604
$1,815,128
$609

 

The performance of the strategy is fairly consistent across the commodity groups, with the currencies, energies, US financials, and metals trading the best. In this group of 70 commodities, only 8 have seen a loss over their lifetime and 4 of those are domestic stock indices. This is remarkable considering the fact that the exact same rules and parameter values are used for the whole set.

HOW YOU TRADE THE ABERRATION STRATEGY

We've developed portfolios for various account sizes. Each portfolio uses diversification across the groups, and a first-N-in-a-group trading approach. The smallest portfolio was built by selecting the lowest risk, best performing commodities. Risk was always considered first. Succeeding portfolios build on the last by adding more commodities to each group.

STARTER PORTFOLIO

THE ABERRATION STRATEGY starter portfolio is suitable for accounts starting in the $10,000 to $30,000 range. The portfolio is diversified across seven commodity groups to gain exposure in uncorrelated markets. The commodities in each group have been carefully chosen for their profit-to-risk characteristics. The portfolio is: Soybeans, KC Wheat, Live Cattle, Lean Hogs, Cotton, Sugar, Palladium, Copper, Crude Oil, Heating Oil, the Dollar Index, Swiss Franc, 10-Year Notes, and 2-Year Notes. Only one commodity in each group is traded at a time, and a one-lot is traded. A slippage/commission deduction of $50 has been taken from each trade. The following equity chart shows portfolio growth since 1980.

startw.bmp

As the graph shows, equity buildup is fairly smooth and consistent. With an average annual profit of $13,209, the average first-year return on a $10,000 to $30,000 account would range from 44 percent to 132 percent. From the risk point of view, the average start-trade draw-down a trader could expect when initiating trading this portfolio would be $2,261, between 8 and 23 percent of starting equity. But the trader should note that in 1995 the maximum start-trade draw-down was $10,889. As equity builds, the portfolio can be expanded to maintain a high rate of return.

The following table shows portfolio performance year-by-year. The column marked average start-trade draw- down is compiled by finding the start-trade draw-down for the portfolio starting at each trade origination and then averaging the results. For example, if the portfolio generated 30 trades in a given year, 30 portfolio equity curves would be generated, one starting at the trade origination of each trade, and the low equity point found for each equity curve. The maximum start-trade draw-down for the year represents the largest point below starting equity a trader would have seen had he started trading the portfolio at the worst possible time that year. (Note that the start-trade draw-down tests every trade originating in a given year, but that the low equity point may occur in the next year. These are reported in the trade origination year averages)

Starter Portfolio

Profit vs. Average and Max Start-Trade Draw-Down (STDD)

Year
Profit ($)

Average STDD ($)

Max STDD ($)
1980
11,249
2,198
6,050
1981
23,616
1,264
2,462
1982
3,459
3.118
7,154
1983
9,253
1,882
4,855
1984
13,204
2,311
4,200
1985
10,592
1,772
6,028
1986
7,915
1,163
3,693
1987
20,879
1,054
3,594
1988
12,020
1,611
7,535
1989
5,369
1,603
6,255
1990
46,581
788
5,263
1991
20,476
2,505
8,131
1992
10,986
1,376
6,311
1993
8,937
1,368
4,547
1994
22,537
743
2,375
1995
4,556
5,548
10,899
1996
2,546
1,560
5,852
1997
10,006
5,086
10,360
1998
27,646
1,737
5,035
1999
14,303
2,028
5,559
2000
8,740
1,795
3,598
2001
13,206
2,781
6,255
2002
17,190
2,509
8,866
2003
8,121
4,663
10,733
2004
11,920
2,525
5,741
2005
8,650
2,273
6,958
2006
8,423
2,526
5,721
Feb 2007
-3,586
1,208
2,801
Average
13,209
2,261
5,958

Forming a reward to risk ratio by dividing average first-year profit by average start-trade draw-down, the "gain- to-pain" ratio is 5.84. This metric can be used to compare portfolios against each other.

By looking at the distribution of all start-trade draw-downs, a probability of success can be determined. The following figure shows the distribution generated by the software. It shows the probability of experiencing a start-trade draw-down of a certain amount of dollars or less. For example this portfolio's distribution shows that 60 percent of the time traders initiating the trading of this portfolio would experience a start-trade draw- down of about $2,000 or less. And about 97 percent of the time, the start-trade draw-down would have been about $8,000 or less. Conversely, 3 percent of the time the start-trade draw-down would have been greater than $8,000.

startstw.bmp

If margin estimates and starting account equity are factored in, the probability of success can be determined. On average, there are 3 group trades on at a time. Assuming an average margin of $1,500 for each commodity in this portfolio, the average margin requirement would be about $4,500. If starting account equity were $15,000, approximately $10,500 of reserves above the average margin requirement is left for a start- trade draw-down cushion. Entering the figure with $10,500 and reading over to the line, historically there was a 98 percent probability of success. But if an account was initially funded with $10,000, the $5,500 of reserves would yield only an 85 percent chance of success. This type of analysis is instructive, but remember the maxim, "A STRATEGIES' LARGEST DRAW-DOWN IS ALWAYS IN THE FUTURE".

MID-SIZE PORTFOLIO


THE ABERRATION STRATEGY mid-size portfolio is suited for accounts starting in the $30,000 to $50,000 range. The portfolio is diversified across seven commodity groups to gain exposure in uncorrelated markets. The commodities in each group have been carefully chosen for their profit-to-risk characteristics. The portfolio is: Soybeans, KC Wheat, Bean Oil, Live Cattle, Lean Hogs, Feeder Cattle, Cotton, Sugar, Lumber, Palladium, Platinum, Copper, Crude Oil, Heating Oil, Natural Gas, the Dollar Index, Swiss Franc, Canadian Dollar, 10-Year Notes, 2-Year Notes, and the Euro-Dollar. Only two commodities in each group are traded at a time, and a one-lot is traded. A slippage/commission deduction of $50 has been taken from each trade. The following equity chart shows portfolio growth since 1980.

midw.bmp

As the graph shows, equity buildup is fairly smooth and consistent. With an average annual profit of $19,645, the average first-year return on a $30,000 to $50,000 account would range from 39 percent to 65 percent. From the risk point of view, the average start-trade draw-down a trader could expect when initiating trading this portfolio would be $3,156, between 7 and 11 percent of starting equity. But the trader should note that in 1995 the maximum start-trade draw-down was $14,957. As equity builds, the portfolio can be expanded to maintain a high rate of return.

The following table shows portfolio performance year-by-year. The column marked average start-trade draw- down is compiled by finding the start-trade draw-down for the portfolio starting at each trade origination and then averaging the results. For example, if the portfolio generated 30 trades in a given year, 30 portfolio equity curves would be generated, one starting at the trade origination of each trade, and the low equity point found for each equity curve. The maximum start-trade draw-down for the year represents the largest point below starting equity a trader would have seen had he started trading the portfolio at the worst possible time that year. (Note that the start-trade draw-down tests every trade originating in a given year, but that the low equity point may occur in the next year.).

Mid-Size Portfolio

Profit vs. Average and Max Start-Trade Draw-Down (STDD)

Year
Profit ($)

Average STDD ($)

Max STDD ($)
1980
14,538
2,690
6,890
1981
33,473
2,068
4,995
1982
5,768
6,548
13,468
1983
16,015
2,641
7,561
1984
18,849
2,631
6,461
1985
20,663
1,184
5,109
1986
20,050
795
3,533
1987
42,972
1,126
4,314
1988
6,661
1,757
7,814
1989
19,654
1,668
6,534
1990
65,699
794
5,375
1991
28,514
2,964
8,296
1992
26,115
2,774
6,796
1993
6,096
3,897
9,063
1994
29,355
711
3,440
1995
15,427
6,975
14,957
1996
-2,357
2,565
9,774
1997
10,404
6,736
13,317
1998
48,836
2,041
7,519
1999
13,318
3,402
9,369
2000
17,391
1,864
6,069
2001
8,395
3,494
7,615
2002
11,054
5,932
12,761
2003
-3,042
8,596
14,197
2004
17,933
3,306
6,975
2005
23,129
2,661
7,549
2006
20,437
2,234
8,202
Feb 2007
-1,466
1,877
4,364
Average
19,645
3,156
7,940

Forming a reward to risk ratio by dividing average first-year profit by average start-trade draw-down, the "gain- to-pain" ratio is 6.22. This metric can be used to compare portfolios against each other.

By looking at the distribution of all start-trade draw-downs, a probability of success can be determined. The following figure shows the distribution generated by the software. It shows the probability of experiencing a start-trade draw-down of a certain amount of dollars or less. For example this portfolio's distribution shows that 70 percent of the time traders initiating the trading of this portfolio would experience a start-trade draw- down of about $4,000 or less. And about 90 percent of the time, the start-trade draw-down would have been about $8,000 or less. Conversely, 10 percent of the time the start-trade draw-down would have been greater than $8,000.

midstw.bmp

If margin estimates and starting account equity are factored in, the probability of success can be determined. On average, there are 6 group trades on at a time. Assuming an average margin of $1,500 for each commodity in this portfolio, the average margin requirement would be about $9,000. If starting account equity were $30,000, approximately $21,000 of reserves above the average margin requirement is left for a start-trade draw-down cushion. There has never been a start-trade draw-down of over $15,000, so the probability of success would have been 100 percent. This type of analysis is instructive, but remember the maxim, "A STRATEGIES' LARGEST DRAW-DOWN IS ALWAYS IN THE FUTURE".

FULL-SIZE PORTFOLIO


THE ABERRATION STRATEGY full-size portfolio is suited for accounts starting in the $30,000 to $50,000 range. The portfolio is diversified across all eight commodity groups to gain exposure in uncorrelated markets. The commodities in each group have been carefully chosen for their profit-to-risk characteristics. The portfolio is: Soybeans, KC Wheat, Bean Oil, Corn, Rough Rice, Live Cattle, Lean Hogs, Feeder Cattle, Pork Bellies, Cotton, Sugar, Lumber, Coffee, London Cocoa, Palladium, Platinum, Copper, London Aluminum, London Nickel, Crude Oil, Heating Oil, Natural Gas, the Dollar Index, Swiss Franc, Canadian Dollar, Euro-Currency, Japanese Yen, 10-Year Notes, 2-Year Notes, the Euro-Dollar, the Euro-Bund, the 5-Year Note, the Nikkei, and the DAX Index. A max of four commodities in each group are traded at a time, and a one-lot is traded. A slippage/commission deduction of $50 has been taken from each trade. The following equity chart shows portfolio growth since 1980.

fullw.bmp

As the graph shows, equity buildup is fairly smooth and consistent. With an average annual profit of $43,921, the average first-year return on a $50,000 to $100,000 account would range from 43 percent to 88 percent. From the risk point of view, the average start-trade draw-down a trader could expect when initiating trading this portfolio would be $4,684, between 5 and 9 percent of starting equity. But the trader should note that in 2003 the maximum start-trade draw-down was $30,020. As equity builds, the portfolio can be expanded to maintain a high rate of return.

The following table shows portfolio performance year-by-year. The column marked average start-trade draw- down is compiled by finding the start-trade draw-down for the portfolio starting at each trade origination and then averaging the results. For example, if the portfolio generated 30 trades in a given year, 30 portfolio equity curves would be generated, one starting at the trade origination of each trade, and the low equity point found for each equity curve. The maximum start-trade draw-down for the year represents the largest point below starting equity a trader would have seen had he started trading the portfolio at the worst possible time that year. (Note that the start-trade draw-down tests every trade originating in a given year, but that the low equity point may occur in the next year. These are reported in the trade origination year averages)

Full-Size Portfolio

Profit vs. Average and Max Start-Trade Draw-Down (STDD)

Year
Profit ($)

Average STDD ($)

Max STDD ($)
1980
24,384
3,133
10,176
1981
45,042
3,373
9,905
1982
10,707
5,370
15,505
1983
28.278
4,134
11,871
1984
17,974
2,864
10,771
1985
53,112
2,010
8,680
1986
37,977
1,023
4,120
1987
83,424
2,169
8,782
1988
38,979
2,321
11,704
1989
24,657
3,475
11,860
1990
111,226
1,285
8,640
1991
75,693
2,824
6,946
1992
47,773
3,486
11,082
1993
49,372
1,456
5,487
1994
62,699
3,725
12,678
1995
49,276
4,126
15,533
1996
39,297
3,138
10,993
1997
60,168
7,016
15,997
1998
80,571
3,603
14,781
1999
79,790
4,135
12,060
2000
37,427
6,157
12,598
2001
30,813
8,695
18,334
2002
27,129
7,102
29,188
2003
11,479
17,822
30,020
2004
24,680
6,606
17,142
2005
44,543
5,760
17,495
2006
-279
6,481
15,447
Feb 2007
-2,612
1,146
3,311
Average
43,921
4,684
12,897

Forming a reward to risk ratio by dividing average first-year profit by average start-trade draw-down, the "gain- to-pain" ratio is 9.38. This metric can be used to compare portfolios against each other.

By looking at the distribution of all start-trade draw-downs, a probability of success can be determined. The following figure shows the distribution generated by the software. It shows the probability of experiencing a start-trade draw-down of a certain amount of dollars or less. For example this portfolio's distribution shows that 60 percent of the time traders initiating the trading of this portfolio would experience a start-trade draw- down of about $4,000 or less. And about 90 percent of the time, the start-trade draw-down would have been about $12,000 or less. Conversely, 10 percent of the time the start-trade draw-down would have been greater than $12,000.

fullstw.bmp

If margin estimates and starting account equity are factored in, the probability of success can be determined. On average, there are 10 group trades on at a time. Assuming an average margin of $1,500 for each commodity in this portfolio, the average margin requirement would be about $15,000. If starting account equity were $50,000, approximately $35,000 of reserves above the average margin requirement is left for a start-trade draw-down cushion. Since there has never been a $35,000 start-trade draw-down on this portfolio, the historical probability of success was 100 percent. This type of analysis is instructive, but remember the maxim, "A STRATEGIES' LARGEST DRAW-DOWN IS ALWAYS IN THE FUTURE".

PORTFOLIO COMPARISON

Many traders will review the portfolio material presented here (summarized in the table below) and decide that when account size grows, it is better to trade more than a one-lot in the "Starter Portfolio" than move up to the next larger portfolio. This is a mistake. those traders are focusing on profits rather than risk, which is the crucial element in whether a small-account trader will survive and grow to be a large-account trader.

Portfolio Comparison

Portfolio
Annual Return on Account Size (percent)

Average STDD on Account Size (percent)

Average Annual Return Divided by Average STDD
Starter
44-132
8-23
5.84
Mid-Size
39-65
7-11
6.22
Full-Size
43-88
5-9
9.38

The trader who looks at profits will see that on a $10,000 to $30,000 account, an annual return of between 44 and 132 percent can be made. He reasons that if he can make 132 percent on $10,000 by trading 1 contract per signal, when the account size grows to $20,000 he can trade 2 contacts per signal and still make 133 percent. This is true, but what he is neglecting is risk. Trading the starter portfolio with $10,000 yields an 85 percent chance of success; about a 5 out of 6 chance. That's exactly akin to playing Russian roulette. Doubling the number of contracts at $20,000 still yields the 5 out of 6 chance. Sooner or later this strategy will lead to a trading blow-out.

The true measure of the portfolio's effectiveness is the ratio in column 4 of the table. The higher this number, the better the return for the risk taken. As a small-account trader grows his account size, he should look to reduce risk (column 3) and take the best return he can get. RISK FIRST!

FOR LARGE ACCOUNT TRADERS, THE GLOBAL PORTFOLIO

THE ABERRATION STRATEGY Global Portfolio is suited for accounts that are larger than $100,000. The portfolio is diversified across the commodity groups to gain exposure in uncorrelated markets. The commodities in the 70-commodity basket that had a profit-per-trade of $300, or more, were included in the portfolio. The portfolio consists of: Kansas City Wheat, Rough Rice, Crude Palm Oil, Soybeans, Live Cattle, Lean Hogs, Cotton, Sugar, Lumber, Coffee, London Cocoa, London Coffee, London Sugar, Silver, Gold, Copper, Palladium, Platinum, London Aluminum Alloy, London Copper, London Aluminum, London Nickel, London Tin, London Zinc, Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Propane, Heating Oil, Reformulated Gas, the Dollar Index, Japanese Yen, Swiss Franc, British Pound, Euro-Currency, Canadian Dollar, 30-Year Bonds, 10-Year Notes, Five-Year Notes, Ten-Year Notes, Euro-dollar, Euro Bund, Euro Bobl, Spanish Bond, Simex Japanese Bond, the DAX, the Hang Seng, the Kospi, the Nasdaq, the Nikkei, and the Swiss Market Index. The following table shows the return risking one percent of equity on each trade and limiting group exposure to four trades, or less.

Global Portfolio

Annual Return and Annual Max Draw-Down

Year
Return (percent)

Max Draw-Down (percent)

1980
9.9
3.1
1981
21.1
5.1
1982
15.7
11.1
1983
17.6
9.3
1984
26.3
10.7
1985
36.9
8.8
1986
14.4
4.2
1987
96.4
7.0
1988
17.4
7.0
1989
53.4
6.6
1990
71.8
8.4
1991
24.5
10.3
1992
44.1
7.3
1993
78.9
11.6
1994
66.4
8.2
1995
24.2
9.4
1996
41.8
11.5
1997
61.5
9.3
1998
62.1
11.6
1999
56.3
7.9
2000
20.3
13.4
2001
17.4
11.1
2002
15.6
8.4
2003
18.0
13.9
2004
15.0
14.0
2005
27.7
13.0
2006
17.3
10.9
Feb2007
-6.4
9.2
Average
35.5
9.6

These results illustrate the power of implementing the money management strategies available to the large-account investor. He can achieve a very high rate of return for a relatively low max annual draw-down. Moreover, he can adjust the percentage of equity risked to either increase his return or lower his draw-down until he achieves a risk/reward scenario suitable to his trading temperament. If, for example, a max draw-down of 14 percent and an average max draw-down of about 10 percent is too high for him, he can lower the amount risked and have lower expected draw-downs. Conversely, if he can stand more risk, he can up the amount risked and achieve a higher return. The graph compares average annual return and average max draw-down for a spectrum of percent of equity risked.

retdraww.bmp

This figure illustrates a further point. As the percent of equity risked increases, return increases at a faster rate than draw-down. This can be seen in the slopes of the two lines on the graph, the return line is much steeper than the draw-down line. This is an important point. It means that THE MORE DRAW-DOWN YOU CAN STAND, THE GREATER THE RELATIVE REWARD.

YOU'LL LOVE THE DIVERSITY AND EASE OF TRADING

• Fully Disclosed. The trading logic is fully disclosed so you'll know exactly why each trade is being placed. This is not a "black-box" system which frustrates traders because they don't know how they work.

•  End-of Day System. You don't have to sit in front of a computer to trade THE ABERRATION STRATEGY. It uses daily bar data for trading decisions. You will know before the open of trading whether there is an order that day. You can place all orders before the market opens. Once the orders have been placed, you don't need to monitor the market the rest of the day.

•  Portfolios for any account size. You won't have to do complicated analysis to determine what to trade. We provide recommended portfolios for any account size, so you can start trading right away.

•  Money Management. Our systems have easy to understand money management rules. You will know exactly what to trade, and in what size each day.

• Easy to use software. You will have Windows-based software to generate daily signals and to back-test performance. You can gain confidence in the robustness of the system by doing your own back-testing with data we provide. For on-going trading signals, you can subscribe to a low-cost data vendor and get the trading signals in less than 5 minutes. You don't have to use the software if you don't want. 

•  Trade Station Code. For those who use Trade Station for trading and back-testing, we have open source code for that platform.

YOU CAN HAVE AN EXPERT TRADE THE SYSTEM FOR YOU

In my seminars, I stress that most traders fail due to an inability to execute their strategy as they planned. Even with great systems, traders throw away their edge by letting their emotions over-rule their plan. I have a network of brokers who will execute the systems for you at a rate only slightly above the discount rate. These brokers are all highly experienced with ABERRATION and routinely it for clients like you. So if you purchase ABERRATION, you can open an account with one of those brokers and have confidence that they are being traded expertly by a registered professional.

GUARANTEE

I don't guarantee future performance. I'm registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, as a Commodity Trading Adviser, CTA, and am prohibited from doing so. In practice, I wouldn't guarantee future performance anyway. There's no way to be sure a strategy will perform indefinitely into the future. What I can, and do, guarantee is that the past performance claims I make for THE ABERRATION STRATEGY are true. Every number on this website comes from a computer using CSI end-of-day data. If you purchase the system your numbers with CSI data will match mine, that's the guarantee. If they don't, I'll give you your money back.

I've sold Aberration, and now THE ABERRATION STRATEGY, to the public for almost 14 years. In all that time no-one has ever claimed my numbers are "fudged" or inaccurate.

WHAT YOU GET

When you purchase THE ABERRATION STRATEGY you will receive:

•  A detailed trading manual which fully discloses the logic, shows past performance on individual commodities and portfolios, explains the money management used for both small- and large-account tradfers, and covers software installation and operation.

• Easy-to-use Windows-based software that lets you back-test commodity and portfolio performance, perform money management analyses, and generate daily trading signals when mated with end-of-day data.

•  Trade Station code (open code).

•  Full Support. We will answer trading questions and technically support the software.

PRICE

THE ABERRATION STRATEGY can be purchased for the reasonable price of $1,995. You can order by credit card through a secure server by clicking the following link. Or, you can send a check to:

TradeSystem, Inc.

11276 Ballantyne Crossing Ave.

Charlotte, NC 28277

For questions, feel free to call us at our toll-free number: 800-372-3942

 

 
Copyright © 2010 Trade System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.